Vitamin D2and vitamin D3 comparisons: Fundamentally flawed study methodology

Susan Lanham-New; Reinhold Vieth; Robert Heaney

doi:10.3945/ajcn.2010.30099

Vitamin D₂and vitamin D₃ comparisons: Fundamentally flawed study methodology

Susan Lanham-New, Reinhold Vieth, Robert Heaney

Department of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	999
Number of pages	1
Journal	American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume	92
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2010.30099
State	Published - Oct 1 2010

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Medicine (miscellaneous)
Nutrition and Dietetics

Access to Document

10.3945/ajcn.2010.30099

Cite this

@article{34ca5737c87c41f6aace4e2b7935dd4e,

title = "Vitamin D2and vitamin D3 comparisons: Fundamentally flawed study methodology",

author = "Susan Lanham-New and Reinhold Vieth and Robert Heaney",

year = "2010",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.3945/ajcn.2010.30099",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "92",

pages = "999",

journal = "American Journal of Clinical Nutrition",

issn = "0002-9165",

publisher = "American Society for Nutrition",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vitamin D2and vitamin D3 comparisons

T2 - Fundamentally flawed study methodology

AU - Lanham-New, Susan

AU - Vieth, Reinhold

AU - Heaney, Robert

PY - 2010/10/1

Y1 - 2010/10/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049446140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78049446140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3945/ajcn.2010.30099

DO - 10.3945/ajcn.2010.30099

M3 - Letter

C2 - 20810978

AN - SCOPUS:78049446140

SN - 0002-9165

VL - 92

SP - 999

JO - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

JF - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

IS - 4

ER -

Vitamin D2and vitamin D3 comparisons: Fundamentally flawed study methodology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this

Vitamin D₂and vitamin D₃ comparisons: Fundamentally flawed study methodology