TY - JOUR
T1 - Omalizumab pretreatment decreases acute reactions after rush immunotherapy for ragweed-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis
AU - Casale, Thomas B.
AU - Busse, William W.
AU - Kline, Joel N.
AU - Ballas, Zuhair K.
AU - Moss, Mark H.
AU - Townley, Robert G.
AU - Mokhtarani, Masoud
AU - Seyfert-Margolis, Vicki
AU - Asare, Adam
AU - Bateman, Kirk
AU - Deniz, Yamo
N1 - Funding Information:
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: Y. Deniz works at and owns stock in Genentech. M. Mokhtarani is employed by Rinat Neuroscience. Z. Ballas has consultant arrangements with Roche, Corixa, and Baxter, and has received grants from the National Institutes of Health and Department of Veterans Administration Merit Review. J. Kline is on the speakers bureau for Merck, Genentech, and GlaxoSmithKline. W. Busse has consultant arrangements with Dynavax, Fujisawa, Genentech, Hoffman La Roche, Isis, Merck, Novartis, Schering, and Wyeth; has received grant support from Altana, Aventis, Dynavax, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffman La Roche, Pfizer, and Wyeth; is on the speakers bureau for GlaxoSmithKline and Merck; and is on the advisory board for AstraZeneca, Aventis, Merck, Pfizer, and Schering. T. Casale has consultant arrangements, has received grants, and is on the speakers bureau for Novartis and Genentech. R. Townley has received grants from Novartis. The rest of the authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Funding Information:
Conducted by the Immune Tolerance Network in collaboration with Genentech, Inc. The Immune Tolerance Network is supported by the National Institutes of Health and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation.
PY - 2006/1
Y1 - 2006/1
N2 - Background: Rush immunotherapy (RIT) presents an attractive alternative to standard immunotherapy. However, RIT carries a much greater risk of acute allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. Objectives: We hypothesized that omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, would be effective in enhancing both safety and efficacy of RIT. Methods: Adult patients with ragweed allergic rhinitis were enrolled in a 3-center, 4-arm, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Patients received either 9 weeks of omalizumab (0.016 mg/kg/IgE [IU/mL]/mo) or placebo, followed by 1-day rush (maximal dose 1.2-4.0 μg Amb a 1) or placebo immunotherapy, then 12 weeks of omalizumab or placebo plus immunotherapy. Results: Of the 159 patients enrolled, 123 completed all treatments. Ragweed-specific IgG levels increased >11-fold in immunotherapy patients, and free IgE levels declined >10-fold in omalizumab patients. Patients receiving omalizumab plus immunotherapy had fewer adverse events than those receiving immunotherapy alone. Post hoc analysis of groups receiving immunotherapy demonstrated that addition of omalizumab resulted in a 5-fold decrease in risk of anaphylaxis caused by RIT (odds ratio, 0.17; P = .026). On an intent-to-treat basis, patients receiving both omalizumab and immunotherapy showed a significant improvement in severity scores during the ragweed season compared with those receiving immunotherapy alone (0.69 vs 0.86; P = .044). Conclusion: Omalizumab pretreatment enhances the safety of RIT for ragweed allergic rhinitis. Furthermore, combined therapy with omalizumab and allergen immunotherapy may be an effective strategy to permit more rapid and higher doses of allergen immunotherapy to be given more safely and with greater efficacy to patients with allergic diseases.
AB - Background: Rush immunotherapy (RIT) presents an attractive alternative to standard immunotherapy. However, RIT carries a much greater risk of acute allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. Objectives: We hypothesized that omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, would be effective in enhancing both safety and efficacy of RIT. Methods: Adult patients with ragweed allergic rhinitis were enrolled in a 3-center, 4-arm, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Patients received either 9 weeks of omalizumab (0.016 mg/kg/IgE [IU/mL]/mo) or placebo, followed by 1-day rush (maximal dose 1.2-4.0 μg Amb a 1) or placebo immunotherapy, then 12 weeks of omalizumab or placebo plus immunotherapy. Results: Of the 159 patients enrolled, 123 completed all treatments. Ragweed-specific IgG levels increased >11-fold in immunotherapy patients, and free IgE levels declined >10-fold in omalizumab patients. Patients receiving omalizumab plus immunotherapy had fewer adverse events than those receiving immunotherapy alone. Post hoc analysis of groups receiving immunotherapy demonstrated that addition of omalizumab resulted in a 5-fold decrease in risk of anaphylaxis caused by RIT (odds ratio, 0.17; P = .026). On an intent-to-treat basis, patients receiving both omalizumab and immunotherapy showed a significant improvement in severity scores during the ragweed season compared with those receiving immunotherapy alone (0.69 vs 0.86; P = .044). Conclusion: Omalizumab pretreatment enhances the safety of RIT for ragweed allergic rhinitis. Furthermore, combined therapy with omalizumab and allergen immunotherapy may be an effective strategy to permit more rapid and higher doses of allergen immunotherapy to be given more safely and with greater efficacy to patients with allergic diseases.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29544443510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29544443510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.09.036
DO - 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.09.036
M3 - Article
C2 - 16387596
AN - SCOPUS:29544443510
SN - 0091-6749
VL - 117
SP - 134
EP - 140
JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
IS - 1
ER -