Debriefing and gratuitous procedures

Gary K. Leak

doi:10.1037/0003-066X.36.3.317.a

Debriefing and gratuitous procedures

Gary K. Leak

Department of Psychological Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

Challenges L. B. Perry and P. R. Abramson's (1980) conclusions about the degree to which the American Psychological Association ethical principles on debriefing have been reported in the literature, questions the necessity of reporting the existence or details of debriefing, and supports their recommendations for debriefing practice. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original language	English (US)
Number of pages	1
Journal	American Psychologist
Volume	36
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.3.317.a
State	Published - Mar 1 1981

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Psychology(all)

Access to Document

10.1037/0003-066X.36.3.317.a

Cite this

@article{45895b2981ce4e91a8fc6ac66e61d981,

title = "Debriefing and gratuitous procedures",

abstract = "Challenges L. B. Perry and P. R. Abramson's (1980) conclusions about the degree to which the American Psychological Association ethical principles on debriefing have been reported in the literature, questions the necessity of reporting the existence or details of debriefing, and supports their recommendations for debriefing practice. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",

author = "Leak, {Gary K.}",

year = "1981",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1037/0003-066X.36.3.317.a",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "36",

journal = "American Psychologist",

issn = "0003-066X",

publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Debriefing and gratuitous procedures

AU - Leak, Gary K.

PY - 1981/3/1

Y1 - 1981/3/1

N2 - Challenges L. B. Perry and P. R. Abramson's (1980) conclusions about the degree to which the American Psychological Association ethical principles on debriefing have been reported in the literature, questions the necessity of reporting the existence or details of debriefing, and supports their recommendations for debriefing practice. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Challenges L. B. Perry and P. R. Abramson's (1980) conclusions about the degree to which the American Psychological Association ethical principles on debriefing have been reported in the literature, questions the necessity of reporting the existence or details of debriefing, and supports their recommendations for debriefing practice. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149408028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149408028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0003-066X.36.3.317.a

DO - 10.1037/0003-066X.36.3.317.a

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:58149408028

SN - 0003-066X

VL - 36

JO - American Psychologist

JF - American Psychologist

IS - 3

ER -

Debriefing and gratuitous procedures

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this