TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost of hospital admission for antiarrhythmic drug initiation in atrial fibrillation
AU - Kim, Michael H.
AU - Klingman, David
AU - Lin, Jay
AU - Pathak, Prathamesh
AU - Battleman, David
PY - 2009/5
Y1 - 2009/5
N2 - BACKGROUND: Initiation of some rhythm-control therapies for atrial fibrillation (AF) requires an inpatient hospital stay and telemetry monitoring, adding to the cost burden of AF. However, specific cost data for inpatient initiation of AF therapies are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To examine costs associated with initiating sotalol or dofetilide in the inpatient setting in the US. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from billing/discharge records in the Premier Perspective Database for adults with a primary diagnosis of AF, hospitalized between January 2002 and September 2007. Patients had to have received 4 or more sotalol doses or 5 or more dofetilide doses starting within 2 days of admission (with ≥1 dose within 3 days of discharge). Patients admitted solely for AF drug initiation were identified by excluding patients who were admitted on an emergency basis, received care in the emergency department, or underwent major surgical procedures. The primary outcome was direct medical costs for in-hospital services during the stay. RESULTS: Among 7290 patients included in the analysis (4847 sotalol, 2443 dofetilide), mean total inpatient costs per patient were $3278 in the sotalol group and $3610 in the dofetilide group. The greatest costs were for room/board ($1874 sotalol, $1985 dofetilide) and cardiology/ electrocardiograms ($394 sotalol, $443 dofetilide). Pharmacy costs were $230 and $201 per patient in the sotalol and dofetilide groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The admission of patients for in-hospital initiation of AF rhythm-control therapy represents a high cost burden in the US.
AB - BACKGROUND: Initiation of some rhythm-control therapies for atrial fibrillation (AF) requires an inpatient hospital stay and telemetry monitoring, adding to the cost burden of AF. However, specific cost data for inpatient initiation of AF therapies are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To examine costs associated with initiating sotalol or dofetilide in the inpatient setting in the US. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from billing/discharge records in the Premier Perspective Database for adults with a primary diagnosis of AF, hospitalized between January 2002 and September 2007. Patients had to have received 4 or more sotalol doses or 5 or more dofetilide doses starting within 2 days of admission (with ≥1 dose within 3 days of discharge). Patients admitted solely for AF drug initiation were identified by excluding patients who were admitted on an emergency basis, received care in the emergency department, or underwent major surgical procedures. The primary outcome was direct medical costs for in-hospital services during the stay. RESULTS: Among 7290 patients included in the analysis (4847 sotalol, 2443 dofetilide), mean total inpatient costs per patient were $3278 in the sotalol group and $3610 in the dofetilide group. The greatest costs were for room/board ($1874 sotalol, $1985 dofetilide) and cardiology/ electrocardiograms ($394 sotalol, $443 dofetilide). Pharmacy costs were $230 and $201 per patient in the sotalol and dofetilide groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The admission of patients for in-hospital initiation of AF rhythm-control therapy represents a high cost burden in the US.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65849427525&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65849427525&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1345/aph.1L698
DO - 10.1345/aph.1L698
M3 - Article
C2 - 19417111
AN - SCOPUS:65849427525
SN - 1060-0280
VL - 43
SP - 840
EP - 848
JO - Annals of Pharmacotherapy
JF - Annals of Pharmacotherapy
IS - 5
ER -