TY - JOUR
T1 - Biological markers in schizophrenia
T2 - An update
AU - Madaan, Vishal
AU - Bestha, Durga Prasad
AU - Kolli, Venkata Bharadwaj
PY - 2010/9/1
Y1 - 2010/9/1
N2 - Biological markers are quantitative measures that allow clinicians to diagnose and assess the disease process, monitor response to treatment and may, to some extent, assist with prognostic assessments (1). Biological markers can modify the way clinicians approach, treat and care for patients. This has significant diagnostic and treatment-related implications, especially for chronic disabling disorders with complex etiopathogenesis, such as schizophrenia. Years of research have yielded a variety of relatively consistent findings in different domains including neuroanatomy, functional and molecular neuroimaging, neurophysiology, genetics and biochemistry. These attributes can complement clinical findings with improved diagnostic validity, and to some extent, assist the clinician in early initiation of efficacious treatment and predicting prognosis. On the contrary, many of these potential biological markers may require expensive testing and enhanced technological expertise. Considering the issues with sensitivity and specificity and an overlap with other neuropsychiatric disorders, their role in routine clinical care continues to be ambiguous.
AB - Biological markers are quantitative measures that allow clinicians to diagnose and assess the disease process, monitor response to treatment and may, to some extent, assist with prognostic assessments (1). Biological markers can modify the way clinicians approach, treat and care for patients. This has significant diagnostic and treatment-related implications, especially for chronic disabling disorders with complex etiopathogenesis, such as schizophrenia. Years of research have yielded a variety of relatively consistent findings in different domains including neuroanatomy, functional and molecular neuroimaging, neurophysiology, genetics and biochemistry. These attributes can complement clinical findings with improved diagnostic validity, and to some extent, assist the clinician in early initiation of efficacious treatment and predicting prognosis. On the contrary, many of these potential biological markers may require expensive testing and enhanced technological expertise. Considering the issues with sensitivity and specificity and an overlap with other neuropsychiatric disorders, their role in routine clinical care continues to be ambiguous.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955896410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955896410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1358/dot.2010.46.9.1485923
DO - 10.1358/dot.2010.46.9.1485923
M3 - Review article
C2 - 20967298
AN - SCOPUS:79955896410
SN - 0025-7656
VL - 46
SP - 661
EP - 669
JO - Drugs of Today
JF - Drugs of Today
IS - 9
ER -