TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of VDR and estrogen receptor genotypes with bone mass in postmenopausal caucasian women
T2 - Different conclusions with different analyses and the implications
AU - Deng, Hong Wen
AU - Li, Jian
AU - Li, Jin Long
AU - Johnson, M.
AU - Gong, G.
AU - Recker, R. R.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - Much work has been done on the association between vitamin D receptor (VDR) genotypes and bone mineral density (BMD). Despite considerable effort, the results are inconsistent. While the VDR association remains unresolved, studies have expanded to other candidate genes (i.e., estrogen receptor (ER) genotypes), also yielding inconsistent results. A few studies have suggested that interaction effects between VDR and ER genotypes significantly affect BMD. We assessed associations of BMD with VDR BsmI genotypes, and ER XbaI and PvuII polymorphisms (denoted as ERX and ERP respectively) with spine, femoral neck, distal radius BMD, and with total body bone mineral content (tbBMC) in 108 US Mid-western postmenopausal Caucasian women. We statistically controlled for confounding factors such as height, weight, etc., in the analysis. No significant association was detected for ER genotypes with spine and radius BMD, or for VDR genotypes with femoral neck and radius BMD and tbBMC. No significant interaction between VDR and ER genotypes was detected in our sample. However, the VDR genotypes are significantly (p = 0.004) associated with ~ 5.8% spine BMD variation. Both ERX and ERP genotypes are significantly (p = 0.02) associated with ~ 3.5% femoral neck BMD variation. ERX genotypes are significantly (p = 0.03) associated with ~ 2.4% tbBMC variation. However, if the data were analyzed by simple ANOVA as in some previous studies, without adjusting statistically for confounding factors, all the significant results we found here would have pone undetected. Our findings suggest that: (1) VDR and ER genotypes may have different effects on BMD at different sites and on tbBMC; and (2) if significant factors influencing bone are not appropiately controlled, true significant associations can easily be missed. These findings may offer a partial explanation for some of the earlier inconsistent results of association studies on BMD with VDR and ER genotypes.
AB - Much work has been done on the association between vitamin D receptor (VDR) genotypes and bone mineral density (BMD). Despite considerable effort, the results are inconsistent. While the VDR association remains unresolved, studies have expanded to other candidate genes (i.e., estrogen receptor (ER) genotypes), also yielding inconsistent results. A few studies have suggested that interaction effects between VDR and ER genotypes significantly affect BMD. We assessed associations of BMD with VDR BsmI genotypes, and ER XbaI and PvuII polymorphisms (denoted as ERX and ERP respectively) with spine, femoral neck, distal radius BMD, and with total body bone mineral content (tbBMC) in 108 US Mid-western postmenopausal Caucasian women. We statistically controlled for confounding factors such as height, weight, etc., in the analysis. No significant association was detected for ER genotypes with spine and radius BMD, or for VDR genotypes with femoral neck and radius BMD and tbBMC. No significant interaction between VDR and ER genotypes was detected in our sample. However, the VDR genotypes are significantly (p = 0.004) associated with ~ 5.8% spine BMD variation. Both ERX and ERP genotypes are significantly (p = 0.02) associated with ~ 3.5% femoral neck BMD variation. ERX genotypes are significantly (p = 0.03) associated with ~ 2.4% tbBMC variation. However, if the data were analyzed by simple ANOVA as in some previous studies, without adjusting statistically for confounding factors, all the significant results we found here would have pone undetected. Our findings suggest that: (1) VDR and ER genotypes may have different effects on BMD at different sites and on tbBMC; and (2) if significant factors influencing bone are not appropiately controlled, true significant associations can easily be missed. These findings may offer a partial explanation for some of the earlier inconsistent results of association studies on BMD with VDR and ER genotypes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032804430&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032804430&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s001980050177
DO - 10.1007/s001980050177
M3 - Article
C2 - 10624457
AN - SCOPUS:0032804430
SN - 0937-941X
VL - 9
SP - 499
EP - 507
JO - Osteoporosis International
JF - Osteoporosis International
IS - 6
ER -